Nieman v. Jacobs
Arizona Supreme Court
1Dissent
BERNSTEIN, Justice, and PHELPS, Chief Justice
(dissenting).
We cannot concur in the disposition of this case by the majority of the Court.
We note that appellee does not dispute that, in accordance with the standard established for common carriers and applied by the great weight of authority to the operation of elevators, it was bound to provide the highest degree of care for the safety of its elevator passengers. Appellant, relying on the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur, claims that appellee was negligent in operating the elevator so as to cause or permit it to slip below the floor level.
We have…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Griffen v. . ManiceNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
- Marshall v. NugentCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1955
- O'Connor v. MennieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Cobb v. Marshall Field & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1959
- Figueroa v. MajorsArizona Supreme Court · 1959
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.