Legal Opinion

Gourlay Et Ux v. P.R.T. Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 9, 1930No. Appeal 170 and 171PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, J.,

The issue between these parties is a narrow one.

On Christmas night of 1927 the plaintiffs were traveling on defendant’s trolley car on their way to 52d Street and Lansdowne Avenue. ■ When the car was about 150 feet distant from 52nd Street, it was blocked by traffic in the street, and without waiting for the traffic to move so that the trolley could arrive at or about the usual stopping place to receive and let off passengers, defendant’s motorman in charge of the car,—it was a one-man car—, called, “All out for 52d Street” and opened the safety door in the front of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McCollum v. Pittsburg Railways Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1912

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Carroll v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  2. Stevens v. Reading Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  3. Homa v. Wilkes-Barre Transit Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  4. Martin Et Ux. v. SteenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  5. Shapiro v. Yellow Cab Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1948

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API