Legal Opinion

The Good Templar

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided November 7, 1899No. 1,015PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Proceeding in admiralty to enforce forfeiture of a vessel engaged in domestic commerce for violation of her license.

1Opinion of the Court

LOWELL, District Judge.

This was a proceeding under Rev. St. § 4377, for the forfeiture of the schooner Good Templar and its cargo of fish. If a considerable part of the cargo was known by the claimant to be smuggled, it was conceded that the vessel is liable to forfeiture under that section. The Resolution, 2 Gall. 47, Fed. Cas. No. 11,709. The libelant contended: (1) That, after probable cause bad been shown for the prosecution, the burden of proving that the goods were not smuggled lay upon the claimant, by virtue of Rev. St. § .909; and (2) that, if this section was held inapplicable to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Coffey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. United States v. ZuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  4. Lilienthal's Tobacco v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  5. United States v. Brig BurdettSupreme Court of the United States · 1835

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Rose v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Two Certain Ford Coupe Automobiles v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1931
  3. Chicago, B. & Q. Ry. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
  4. United States v. RendleCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1925
  5. United States v. Southern Pac. Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1908

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API