United States v. Zucker
Supreme Court of the United States
ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. The case is stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Harlan
By the act of June 10, 1890, c. 407, § 9, 26 Stat. 181, 135, known as the Customs Administrative Act, it is provided that “if any owner, importer, consignee, agent, or other person shall make or attempt to make any entry of imported merchandise by means of any fraudulent or false invoice, affidavit, letter, paper, or by means of any false statement, written or verbal, or by means of any false or fraudulent practice or appliance whatsoever, or shall be guilty of any wilful act or omission by means whereof the United States shall be deprived of the lawful duties or any portion thereof, accruing…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Counselman v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Coffey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Lees v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
3Cited by97 opinions
- Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Helvering v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Hannah v. LarcheSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Ex Parte QuirinSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Connecticut Action Now, Inc. v. Roberts Plating Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.