Legal Opinion
Natural Motion by Sandra, Inc. v. District of Columbia Commission on Human Rights
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided March 18, 1999No. 97-AA-1664PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUIZ, Associate Judge.
This is a petition for review of a decision of the District of Columbia Commission on Human Rights (Commission) awarding interve-nor, the Estate of Richard Andre Hamilton, litigation expenses and attorney’s fees. Petitioners, Sandra Butler and Natural Motion by Sandra, Inc., claim that the Commission erred in awarding attorney’s fees because Hamilton’s petition for fees was not timely filed. In the alternative, appellants assert that, because Hamilton, on remand, waived his claim for back pay damages, the Commission should have subtracted specific charges related to…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Newman v. Piggie Park Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Blanchard v. BergeronSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- District of Columbia Department of Employment Services v. VilcheDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- David P. Frankel v. District of Columbia Office for Planning and Economic DevelopmentDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
- Coto v. CITIBANK FSBDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- George S. Thanos v. District of Columbia and District of Columbia v. George S. ThanosDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
- Ottenberg's Bakers, Inc. v. District of Columbia Commission on Human RightsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.