Legal Opinion
District of Columbia Department of Employment Services v. Vilche
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided August 30, 2007No. 05-AA-7PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FISHER, Associate Judge:
The District of Columbia Department of Employment Services (“DOES”) determined that respondent Maritza Vilehe had received unemployment compensation benefits to which she was not entitled and ordered her to repay $6,358. She sought review, and an administrative law judge (“ALJ”) reversed those determinations after concluding that DOES was not prepared to present its case at the scheduled hearing. DOES petitions this court to review that administrative order. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.
I. OAH Proceedings
DOES claims examiner Vernell Dodd made an…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Withrow v. LarkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- In Re Murchison.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Reyes v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
- Berkley v. D.C. Transit, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- Capitol Hill Restoration Society v. District of Columbia Mayor's Agent for Historic PreservationDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
- Hegwood v. Chinatown CVS, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- Douglas-Slade v. United States Department of TransportationDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.