Legal Opinion

Bodenstedt v. Rickers

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1972No. 38503PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, C. J.

The issue raised in this case is narrow. It is simply whether section 79-603, R. R. S. 1943, is an act independent in nature or whether it is purely amendatory of existing legislation and therefore runs afoul of Article III, section 14, Constitution of Nebraska, requiring that the title to amendatory acts state the section or sections of the law to be amended. The district court held the section constitutional, and we affirm the judgment of the district court.

Under the provisions of section 79-603, R. R. S. 1943, no Class I school district which contracts for instruction after June 1, 1970,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Meyer v. DuxburyNebraska Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Blair Company v. American Savings CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Hinman v. TempleNebraska Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Live Stock National Bank v. JacksonNebraska Supreme Court · 1939
  5. In Re Conservatorship of SchurmannNebraska Supreme Court · 1968

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. PPG Industries Canada Ltd. v. KreuscherNebraska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. State Ex Rel. Douglas v. GradwohlNebraska Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Blackledge v. RichardsNebraska Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Neeman v. Nebraska Natural Resources CommissionNebraska Supreme Court · 1974
  5. City of Lincoln v. Nebraska Public Power DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1974

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API