Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Neeman v. Nebraska Natural Resources Commission

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 1974No. 39227PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoslaugh, J.

This is an action for a declaratory judgment to deter*673mine the validity of legislation relating to natural resources districts. The plaintiffs are the Richardson County Soil and Water Conservation District and two residents and taxpayers within the Wilson Creek Watershed Conservancy District. The defendants are the Nebraska Natural Resources Commission and its executive secretary; the Nebraska Soil and Water Conservation Commission and its executive secretary; the Wilson Creek Watershed Conservancy District; the Attorney General; the Auditor of Public Accounts; and the State of Nebraska. The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Martin v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Nickel v. School Board of AxtellNebraska Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Wittler v. BaumgartnerNebraska Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Williams v. County of BuffaloNebraska Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Heywood v. BrainardNebraska Supreme Court · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Taylor v. KarrerNebraska Supreme Court · 1976
  2. GRISHAM v. CITY OF OKLAHOMA CITYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
  3. GRISHAM v. CITY OF OKLAHOMA CITYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
  4. Neeman v. Nebraska Natural Resources CommissionNebraska Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Opinion No. (1977), Nebraska Attorney General Reports1977

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API