Legal Opinion

PPG Industries Canada Ltd. v. Kreuscher

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 1979No. 42257PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKrivosha, C. J.

This is an appeal from a decision of the District Court for Lancaster County, Nebraska, determining that plaintiff herein was subject to the provisions of the Nebraska Commercial Fertilizer and Soil Conditioner Act, sections 81-2,162.01 et seq., R. R. S. 1943, as amended (the Act). For the reasons set out herein we find that the plaintiff is not subject to the provisions of the Nebraska Commercial Fertilizer and Soil Conditioner Act, and reverse and remand the trial court’s decree.

Plaintiff (PPG) is a Canadian corporation involved in the mining and processing of potash through a division…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Prendergast v. NelsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Lincoln Dairy Company v. FiniganNebraska Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Duke Power Company v. ClaytonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  4. State v. JenningsNebraska Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Tom & Jerry, Inc. v. Nebraska Liquor Control CommissionNebraska Supreme Court · 1968

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Sorensen v. MeyerNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
  2. State v. VicarsNebraska Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Watson v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Adkisson v. City of ColumbusNebraska Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Hill v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1983

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API