Investment Securities Co. v. Adams
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Kennan, J., entered July 1, 1903, upon findings in favor of the defendants, after a trial on the merits before tie court without a jury, denying plaintiff’s right to foreclose a mortgage as to an undivided half interest in the property.
1Opinion of the CourtHadley, J.
In 1890 one James M. Adams and Phoebe I). Adams, his wife, executed their promissory notes, and mortgage securing the same, to the Jarvis-Conklin Mortgage Trust Company. Said James M. Adams afterwards died, and Phoebe D. Adams, his widow, became the ad*213ministratrix of Ms estate. The said mortgagee also assigned Me mortgage to the Investment Securities Company, and, upon default in payment, Me latter brought this suit, in 1897, to foreclose Me mortgage. Phoebe D. Adams, in her own right and also as administratrix, was made a party defendant- Decree of foreclosure was entered, and the property…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Goodenow v. EwerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Spect v. SpectCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Rogers v. BentonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
- Cooke v. CooperOregon Supreme Court · 1889
- Boggs v. Fowler & HargraveCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Burns v. HiattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Meyer v. LemleyMontana Supreme Court · 1929
- Williams v. WilliamsArizona Supreme Court · 1927
- Sawyer v. Vermont Loan & Trust Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1906
- Clise v. BurnsWashington Supreme Court · 1933
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.