Legal Opinion

Clise v. Burns

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 1933No. 24435. En BancPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

This is an appeal from an order appointing a receiver for mortgaged premises in Seattle during the pendency of the suit. The appointment of the receiver was based upon the amended complaint, the answer of appellant, and certain affidavits set out in the statement of facts.

The order of the lower court appointing the receiver was to the effect that the receiver was to act in the nature of a custodian to manage the real property, collect the rents, income and profits therefrom until sheriff’s sale, the court specifically stating that the order was made because of the peculiar relationship of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Norfor v. BusbyWashington Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Western Loan & Building Co. v. MifflinWashington Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Peterson v. Philadelphia Mortgage & Trust Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Sloane v. LucasWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Investment Securities Co. v. AdamsWashington Supreme Court · 1905

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. John Davis & Co. v. Cedar Glen Four, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Coleman v. HoffmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  3. In the Matter of Federal Shopping Way, Inc., a Washington Corporation, Debtor. Bank of California, N. A., Tacoma, Washington v. Thomas L. McQuaid Lifetime Federal Savings & Loan Association v. Thomas L. McQuaid Evergreen First Federal Savings & Loan Association v. Thomas L. McQuaid Republic National Life Insurance Company v. Thomas L. McQuaidCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1972
  4. Debentures Incorporated v. ZechWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Bank of California, N. A. v. McQuaidCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API