Legal Opinion

Eid v. Hodson

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided January 30, 1996No. C2-95-1686Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FOLEY, Judge. *

Appellants Dennis and Mary Ann Hodson were sued for fraud and negligent misrepresentation in connection with the sale of their home to respondents Norman and Mary Eid. A jury found the Hodsons and co-defendant Scandy Concrete Company guilty of fraud and negligent misrepresentation. The jury awarded the Eids damages in the amount of $32,289.32, but apportioned fault among all of the parties. The court then granted a post-trial motion by the Eids to reallocate the entire damages award between the Hodsons and Scandy Concrete in accordance with the jury finding of the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Frost-Benco Electric Ass'n v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Burton v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
  3. Quaker Oats Co. v. Sands, Taylor & Wood Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Allied Materials Corporation v. Superior Products Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
  5. Mario Chavez, of the Estate of Valentina Chavez v. Anis Balesh, D/B/A Hollywood CafeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API