Legal Opinion

United States v. Joseph

U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review

Decided November 15, 1991No. NMCM 90 3256PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REED, Judge:

Before a general court-martial composed of a military judge alone, and pursuant to his pleas, appellant was found guilty of a violation of a lawful regulation by using a government vehicle for personal use in violation of Article 92, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 892; the wrongful appropriation of a government camera and lens in violation of Article 121, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 921; and wrongfully engaging in sexual intercourse in violation of Article 134, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 934. Despite his not guilty pleas, he was also found guilty of an aggravated assault in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Doe v. CoughlinNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. United States v. WomackUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
  3. United States v. StewartUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
  4. United States v. JohnsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
  5. United States v. ReddingUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1963

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. JosephUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1993
  2. United States v. BanksU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1993
  3. United States v. BygraveU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API