Legal Opinion
Truck Drivers & Helpers Local Union No. 696 v. Grosshans & Petersen, Inc.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided June 29, 1962No. T-2933PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ARTHUR J. STANLEY, Jr., Chief Judge.
Plaintiff has objected to certain interrogatories served upon it by the defendant and has moved to compel more complete answers by the defendant to interrogatories served by the plaintiff. The interrogatories objected to are:
“3. Give the names and addresses of the person or persons who filed a grievance or grievances within the provision of Article IX of the Agreement attached to the Complaint as ‘Exhibit A’. The date or dates of filing and the names of the officers, agents, or representatives of the plaintiff receiving same.
“4. List the names and addresses…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Schatte v. International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees and Moving Picture MacHine Operators of United States and CanadaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
- Cogdill v. Tennessee Valley AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1947
- Pierce v. PierceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1946
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hoffman v. United Telecommunications, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1987
- Rosado v. Tribunal Superior de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1967
- Truck Drivers and Helpers Local Union No. 696 v. Grosshans & Petersen, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1962
- Uinta Oil Refining Company v. Continental Oil CompanyDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1964
- Griffin v. Memphis Sales & Manufacturing Co.District Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1965
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.