Legal Opinion

Pierce v. Pierce

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided February 27, 1946No. Civil Action No. 31462PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLTZOFF, Justice.

This is an action for absolute divorce on the ground of adultery. The defendant, under Rule 33 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, filed interrogatories directed to the plaintiff, requesting information as to the specific dates and places of the commission of the alleged acts of adultery, and now moves that the plaintiff be directed to answer the interrogatories.

One of the purposes of interrogatories is to narrow the issues and to enable the interrogating party to ascertain precisely what he will have to meet at the trial. This…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1961
  2. Moore v. NapolitanoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
  3. Autoridad de las Fuentes Fluviales de Puerto Rico v. Corte de Distrito de BayamónSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1947
  4. Chenault v. Nebraska Farm Products, Inc.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1949
  5. Truck Drivers & Helpers Local Union No. 696 v. Grosshans & Petersen, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API