Legal Opinion

Hoffman v. United Telecommunications, Inc.

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided May 12, 1987No. Civ. A. No. 76-223-C2PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

GERALD L. RUSHFELT, United States Magistrate.

Under consideration are Defendants’ Motion to Compel Answers to Their Interrogatories Regarding Existence of Facially Neutral Personnel Policies, Practices and Procedures Alleged to Have a Disparate Impact on Females and Claims of Intentional Sex Discrimination—First Set (doc. 739) and Plaintiff and Plaintiff-intervenor’s Motion to Compel Answers to Interrogatories (doc. 742).

Defendants’ Motion to Compel (doc. 739)

Defendants request a court order, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 37, compelling plaintiffintervenor to answer 24…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Rich v. Martin Marietta Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
  3. Roesberg v. Johns-Manville Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Barclaysamerican Corp. v. KaneCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
  5. Peter J. Brennan, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Engineered Products, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Pulsecard, Inc. v. Discover Card Services, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1996
  2. Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co. of Chicago v. CatonDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1991
  3. Starlight International Inc. v. HerlihyDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1999
  4. Thomas v. CateDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2010
  5. Smith v. Logansport Community School Corp.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1991

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API