Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Hutchinson

California Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 1904No. Sac. No. 1014PublishedCited by 9 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.

This action was brought to quiet title to a tract of land in Calaveras County, containing 122.15 acres. The defendants claimed title to a portion thereof consisting of 74.50 acres.

Both plaintiffs and defendants claimed under placer-mining locations alleged to have been made by them, the plaintiffs’ location, called the Kentucky Placer Mine, being alleged to have been made on February 8, 1889, and the defendants’, called the Paragon Placer Mine, on August 31, 1897.

The plaintiffs obtained judgment, and the defendants appeal therefrom on the judgment-roll. The only questions presented are as to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Quigley v. GillettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. People's Home Savings Bank v. RickardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Haight v. HaightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  2. McLean v. LadewigCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  3. Buehler v. BassettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  4. Denman v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Fuller Ex Rel. Fuller v. Mountain SculptureUtah Supreme Court · 1957

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API