Thompson Crane & Trucking Co. v. Eyman
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.
This action was commenced as one in interpleader. The plaintiff alleged that the defendants Eyman and Weller claimed adverse interests in the proceeds of a note given by plaintiff to Weller, and assigned by him to Eyman. By appropriate pleadings Weller and Eyman each claimed the money, Eyman relying on an assignment of the note and a claimed breach of contract and Weller claiming that the contract had been obtained through compulsion and duress. The money due on the note was deposited in court, it was stipulated that the plaintiff should have its judgment of interpleader, and the action was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bagdasarian v. GragnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Hines v. BrodeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Rothstein v. Janss Investment Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1941
- Young v. HoaglandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Steffen v. Refrigeration Discount Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1949
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Leeper v. BeltramiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Rich & Whillock, Inc. v. Ashton Development, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1984
- Storage Services v. OosterbaanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- In Re Consol. Pretrial Proceedings in Air WestDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1977
- U. S. Hertz, Inc. v. Niobrara FarmsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.