Legal Opinion

Torok v. Jones

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1983No. 82-567PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.

Appellants present this court with three arguments why the judgments below should be reversed.

First, appellants argue that the six-month limitation contained in the zoning permits is invalid. Essentially, appellants assert that state enabling statutes do not authorize limitations such as that contained in Section 10.6 of the Green Township zoning ordinance.2

A township’s authority to enact zoning ordinances is not inherent, nor does it derive from a constitutional provision. Rather, this authority is dependent upon a grant by the General Assembly. Yorkavitz v. Bd. of Trustees (1957), 166 Ohio…

2Cited by18 opinions

  1. Alesi v. Warren Cty. Bd. of Commrs.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. Dsuban v. Union Township Board of Zoning AppealsOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. Swan Creek Township v. Wylie & Sons LandscapingOhio Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. City of Wooster v. Entertainment One, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. Apple Group, Ltd. v. Granger Township Board of Zoning AppealsOhio Supreme Court · 2015

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API