Legal Opinion
Dsuban v. Union Township Board of Zoning Appeals
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided December 18, 2000No. Case No. CA2000-03-055PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Powell, Presiding Judge.
Appellant, Union Township Board of Zoning Appeals (“the board”) appeals the decision of the Butler County Court of Common Pleas finding the standards for variances in the Union Township Zoning Resolution invalid and illegal. We affirm the decision of the common pleas court.
Anton Dsuban III and Mary Ann Dsuban (“the Dsubans”) own property in Union Township, Butler County. The property is a back lot located in a “M-2” General Industrial District under the Union Township Zoning Resolution.
The Dsubans’ property has a fence topped with strands of barbed wire. This fence…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Kisil v. City of SanduskyOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Duncan v. Village of MiddlefieldOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- Board of Township Trustees v. Funtime, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1990
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- CBS Outdoor, Inc. v. Cleveland Bd. of Zoning AppealsOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- Gould v. Santa Fe CountyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2001
- Smith v. Warren Cty. Rural Zoning Bd. of Zoning AppealsOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
- Stickelman v. Harrison Township Board of Zoning AppealsOhio Court of Appeals · 2002
- Mills v. Walnut Twp. Bd. of Zoning AppealsOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.