Legal Opinion

Vaughn v. Montgomery Ward & Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 12, 1950No. Civ. 14186PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PETERS, P.

Plaintiff slipped and fell in a store operated by Montgomery Ward & Company in Burlingame and fractured her left kneecap. She brought this action alleging *554that “defendant was careless, reckless and negligent in that prior to the happening of the injuries herein complained of, defendant . . . placed upon the floor surface of its said store building an excess amount of oily, slippery, liquid substance or material and failed to use reasonable care in applying said oily, slippery substance or material to the surface of said floor, and failed to use reasonable or ordinary care in the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hatfield v. Levy BrothersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Tuttle v. CrawfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Blumberg v. M. & T. IncorporatedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Williamson v. HardyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  5. Wills v. JJ Newberry Co.California Court of Appeal · 1941

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Centennial Bowl, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Brown v. Poway Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Oldenburg v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1957
  4. Sanders v. MacFarlane's CandiesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  5. Beauchamp v. Los Gatos Golf CourseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API