Legal Opinion

Sanders v. MacFarlane's Candies

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 4, 1953No. Civ. 15455PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.

Plaintiffs, husband and wife, brought action for serious personal injuries suffered by the wife as the result of a fall in defendant’s store in San Jose. Plaintiff in singular will hereafter refer to the wife. The cause was tried before a jury. Plaintiffs appeal from judgment of non-suit entered at the close of their case. The only question presented is whether their evidence was sufficient to go to the jury. _

_ Plaintiff’s evidence supporting the action was in substance as follows:

Before the accident plaintiff was a dancing teacher, teaching ballet, tap, acrobatic dancing, et cetera. In the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Blank v. CoffinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Hatfield v. Levy BrothersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Tuttle v. CrawfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Vaccarezza v. SanguinettiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  5. Gardner v. SeymourWashington Supreme Court · 1947

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Frazier, Dame, Doherty, Parrish & Hanawalt v. Boccardo, Blum, Lull, Niland, Teerlink & BellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  2. Hilyar v. Union Ice Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Gilbert v. Pessin Grocery Co.California Court of Appeal · 1955
  4. Oldenburg v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. Aguimatang v. California State LotteryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API