Legal Opinion

Wood v. Casserleigh

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 15, 1902No. 4277PublishedCited by 27 opinions

Error to the District Court of Arapahoe County.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gabbert

Plaintiffs in error, Thomas E. and Charles E. Wood, were the owners of an interest in' a mining claim then in the possession of, and for a long time operated by, other parties. Their ancestor was one of the locators of these mining premises. For the purpose of having proceedings instituted to recover their interest in this property, they entered into an agreement with defendant' in error, which, though inartificially drawn, in substance recited and provided that the latter 'was then in possession of the *290evidence necéssary' to establish the citizenship of their ancestor, and that in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kauffman v. RaederCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
  2. Holmes v. . EvansNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. Frue v. HoughtonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1882
  4. German Savings Inst. v. De La Vergne Refrigerating Mach. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1895
  5. Johnson County v. BrysonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1887

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Martin Marietta Corp. v. LorenzSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  2. Stearns v. WilliamsIdaho Supreme Court · 1952
  3. People ex rel. Arkansas Valley Sugar Beet & Irrigated Land Co. v. BurkeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923
  4. Wright v. CorbinWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Worlton v. DavisIdaho Supreme Court · 1952

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API