Legal Opinion

Van Blarcum v. City of North Myrtle Beach

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided October 18, 1999No. 3051PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOOLSBY, Judge:

This case involves a dispute between the City of North Myrtle Beach and Richard and Deborah Van Blarcum over the ownership and use of three areas of property adjoining the Van Blareums’ beachfront motel and residence. The master-in-equity found the Van Blareums held “record title” to a beach area that lies seaward of their lots down to the high-*449water mark of the Atlantic Ocean, but found the area to have been dedicated and thus subject to the public’s right to use and enjoy a portion of it and to the City’s right to maintain that portion. He also found the City had accepted a…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Tupper v. Dorchester CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  2. Noisette v. IsmailSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  3. Chafee v. City of AikenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1900
  4. Epps v. FreemanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1973
  5. Corbin v. CHEROKEE REALTY CO.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1956

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Vick v. South Carolina Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001
  2. Murrells Inlet Corp. v. WardCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
  3. Historic Charleston Holdings, LLC v. MallonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
  4. Spence Ex Rel. Estate of Spence v. WingateCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
  5. Town of Kingstree v. ChapmanCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API