Legal Opinion

Kennedy v. Chadwell

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 31, 1950No. 33455PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHalley, J.

Arthur W. Kennedy and Bertram S. Harris, attorneys, sue A. Ben Chadwell in the district court of Oklahoma county to recover upon two judgments of the superior court of Los Angeles county, California, ordering the defendant to pay directly to the plaintiffs two sums as attorneys’ fees pendente lite. One judgment was entered March 15 and the other October 10, 1938, and they were not appealed from.

These attorneys’ fees were allowed for, services rendered in an action in which three minor children of the defendant, acting through their mother, Amboline Chadwell, as guardian ad lit-em, sought a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Sharon v. SharonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Forbes v. HydeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  3. Adams v. AdamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
  4. In Re Estate of PuseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Pennell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Owens v. OwensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
  2. McCrary v. McCrarySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
  3. McCrary v. McCrarySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API