Owens v. Owens
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Per curiam
The question here has to do with the validity of that portion of the judgment in a divorce case which allowed attorneys fees against the husband after granting a divorce and alimony and child support and child custody.
It is contended that the attorneys fee allowance is void on account of the manner in which it was stated in the judgment. It referred to the item of attorneys fees as follows:
“The court . further finds that, beginning on June 4, 1943, and extending down to and including the present date the defendant Esther Webb Owens, has had the services in this proceeding and in related…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Fraley, Adm'r v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Mabry v. BairdSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
- Friedman v. FriedmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Kelly v. MaupinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Harmon v. HinesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Nichols v. NicholsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
- Hanska v. HanskaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
- Swick v. SwickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Nuckolls v. NuckollsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
- Nichols v. NicholsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.