Legal Opinion

Varner v. Indiana Parole Board

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 4, 2009No. 45A04-0812-CR-693PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROBB, Judge.

Case Summary and Issues

Kevin Varner, an inmate at Plainfield Correctional Facility, filed a pro se action for mandate requiring the Indiana Parole Board (the "Board") to determine his parole eligibility based on a vote of all five Board members. The trial court summarily dismissed that action, either for lack of subject matter jurisdiction or pursuant to Indiana Code section 34-58-1-2(a), a statute requiring trial courts to prescreen the legal sufficiency of claims filed by pro se prisoners such as Varner. On appeal, Var-ner contends the trial court's summary dismissal was…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Cooper Industries, LLC v. City of South BendIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Blanck v. Ind. Dep't of Corr.Indiana Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Ratliff v. CohnIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Gray v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Meyers v. MeyersIndiana Supreme Court · 2007

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Varner v. Indiana Parole BoardIndiana Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Lavelle Malone v. Keith Butts and Bruce LemmonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API