Varner v. Indiana Parole Board
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBB, Judge.
Case Summary and Issues
Kevin Varner, an inmate at Plainfield Correctional Facility, filed a pro se action for mandate requiring the Indiana Parole Board (the "Board") to determine his parole eligibility based on a vote of all five Board members. The trial court summarily dismissed that action, either for lack of subject matter jurisdiction or pursuant to Indiana Code section 34-58-1-2(a), a statute requiring trial courts to prescreen the legal sufficiency of claims filed by pro se prisoners such as Varner. On appeal, Var-ner contends the trial court's summary dismissal was…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Cooper Industries, LLC v. City of South BendIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
- Blanck v. Ind. Dep't of Corr.Indiana Supreme Court · 2005
- Ratliff v. CohnIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
- Gray v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1993
- Meyers v. MeyersIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Varner v. Indiana Parole BoardIndiana Supreme Court · 2010
- Lavelle Malone v. Keith Butts and Bruce LemmonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012