Legal Opinion
Gray v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided November 24, 1993No. 07A04-9210-CV-379PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHEZEM, Judge.
Case Summary
Patrick Gray et al. (“Gray”) and David Griffin et al. (“Griffin”) appeal the trial court’s decision to grant Westinghouse Electric Company’s (“Westinghouse”) motions to dismiss their consolidated nuisance and punitive damages claims under Ind.Trial Rule 12(B)(6). Gray also appeals the trial court’s dismissal of his complaint pursuant to Ind.Trial Rule 41(E). We reverse the dismissals under T.R. 12(B)(6) and affirm the dismissal under T.R. 41(E).
Issues
Gray and Griffin present the following issues for review:
1. Did the trial court properly dismiss both nuisance…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Orkin Exterminating Co., Inc. v. TrainaIndiana Supreme Court · 1986
- Hale v. Peabody Coal CompanyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
- Armory Park Neighborhood Ass'n v. Episcopal Community ServicesArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Kraft, Incorporated v. Local Union 327, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Helpers and Taxicab DriversCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
- Denneau v. Indiana & Michigan Electric CompanyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1971
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Reed v. ReidIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
- Cooper Industries, LLC v. City of South BendIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
- McQueen v. Fayette County School Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1999
- City of Gary Ex Rel. King v. Smith & Wesson Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 2003
- Mitchell v. StevensonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.