Varner v. Indiana Parole Board
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SULLIVAN, Justice.
When the five-member Parole Board denied an inmate parole by a vote in which only four members participated, the inmate sought to compel a vote by all five members. The statute governing final decisions by the Parole Board requires the "fall parole board" to make the determination. We find that a majority of the Board constitutes the "full parole board" for this purpose. As such, the inmate received a decision from the board that accorded with the statute's requirements.
Background
On October 9, 2008, four out of the five members of the Indiana Parole Board conducted a hearing…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Elmer Buchta Trucking, Inc. v. StanleyIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
- City of Carmel v. SteeleIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
- Indiana Department of State Revenue v. Colpaert Realty Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1952
- State v. American Family Voices, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2008
- Superior Construction Co. v. CarrIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- McCabe v. Commissioner, Indiana Department of InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 2011
- Lavelle Malone v. Keith Butts and Bruce LemmonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
- Storie v. RANDY'S AUTO SALES, LLCIndiana Supreme Court · 2010
- Kenneth W. Gibbs-El v. Christopher E. MeloyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
- McCabe v. Commissioner, Indiana Department of InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 2011