Legal Opinion

Varner v. Indiana Parole Board

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 2010No. 45S04-0909-CR-407PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SULLIVAN, Justice.

When the five-member Parole Board denied an inmate parole by a vote in which only four members participated, the inmate sought to compel a vote by all five members. The statute governing final decisions by the Parole Board requires the "fall parole board" to make the determination. We find that a majority of the Board constitutes the "full parole board" for this purpose. As such, the inmate received a decision from the board that accorded with the statute's requirements.

Background

On October 9, 2008, four out of the five members of the Indiana Parole Board conducted a hearing…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Elmer Buchta Trucking, Inc. v. StanleyIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
  2. City of Carmel v. SteeleIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Indiana Department of State Revenue v. Colpaert Realty Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1952
  4. State v. American Family Voices, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Superior Construction Co. v. CarrIndiana Supreme Court · 1990

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McCabe v. Commissioner, Indiana Department of InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Lavelle Malone v. Keith Butts and Bruce LemmonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. Storie v. RANDY'S AUTO SALES, LLCIndiana Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Kenneth W. Gibbs-El v. Christopher E. MeloyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. McCabe v. Commissioner, Indiana Department of InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API