Legal Opinion
Meyers v. Meyers
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided February 21, 2007No. 29S04-0609-CV-326PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DICKSON, Justice.
We reaffirm the Indiana employment at will doctrine and decline to find exception for alleged wrongful discharge in retaliation for the assertion of a claim for unpaid wages.
Paul Meyers filed a three-count complaint naming as defendants “James Meyers and Eva Meyers, d/b/a J. Meyers Construction, Inc.” Count I seeks damages 1 for failure to pay overtime under Indiana Code § 22 — 2—2—4(j); Count II asks for recovery of $8,368.44 for taxes withheld from the plaintiffs payroll checks but not deposited with the Internal Revenue Service; and Count III requests damages from the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Frampton v. Central Indiana Gas CompanyIndiana Supreme Court · 1973
- Eddie Trail and Katrinka Trail v. Boys and Girls Clubs of Northwest IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
- Orr v. Westminster Village North, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1997
- McClanahan v. Remington Freight Lines, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1988
- Martin v. PlattIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Kellie Pierce v. Zoetis, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- John Roe I v. Bridgestone Corp.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2007
- Kristie Alley v. Penguin Random HouseCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2023
- Whirlpool Corp. v. Vanderburgh County-City of Evansville Human Relations CommissionIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- Daniel Harris v. Donald brewer, Donald Crockett, and Thomas Lamb, Orange County Commissioners as governing body of the Orange County Highway Dept.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2015
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.