Legal Opinion
Joseph R. Maas, et al. v. JTM Provisions Company, Inc., et al.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided February 2, 2026No. 1:23-cv-00076Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION JOSEPH R. MAAS, et al., : : Plaintiffs, : Case No. 1:23-cv-76 : v. : Judge Jeffery P. Hopkins : JTM PROVISIONS COMPANY, INC., : et al., : : Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER Pending before the Court is the Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 91) (the “Motion”) filed by Plaintiff Joseph R. Maas (“Joe” or “Plaintiff”). Joe seeks judgment on JTM’s affirmative defenses. In the time since that Motion was filed, JTM filed its response and has provided two separate notices dismissing certain affirmative defenses.1 See…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Saeid B. Amini v. Oberlin CollegeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.