Legal Opinion

Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co. v. McWhorter

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided April 22, 1924PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Boyle Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge McCandless

Eeversing.

The C., N. O. & T. P. Eailway Company owns and operates a line of railway in the states of Kentucky and Tennessee, passing through a mountainous section between Somerset, Kentucky, and Oakdale, Tennessee. From the CD tower to KD tower in Kentucky, a distance of 4% miles, there is a double track. At the latter point the lines converge and run northward over a single track, the switch being a short distance to the noirth of the tower. There is a deep cut to the south and an approaching train is not visible until it is within six hundred feet of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wells Fargo & Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway v. HenryCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  3. Thompson v. Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  4. Ohio Valley Electric Railway Co. v. Brumfield's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  5. Thomas v. Haly Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sparks v. MaeschalCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
  2. Stemper v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  3. Collins v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  4. Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co. v. McWhorterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
  5. Benscoter v. B. G. Coon Construction Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Luzerne County1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API