Benscoter v. B. G. Coon Construction Co.
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Luzerne County
1Opinion of the Court
PiNOLA, J.,
Additional defendant has filed three preliminary objections: (1) Paragraph *8511 of the complaint should be stricken because defendant cannot sue additional defendant railroad under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act; (2) defendant has no right under the pleadings to maintain an action against it, and (3) paragraph 12 of the complaint should be stricken because plaintiff has no right of action against additional defendant under the common law or statutory law of the State.
On October 11, 1954, plaintiff was a passenger on a small motor car operated by a fellow employe of the Lackawanna…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Waylander-Peterson Co. v. Great Northern Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1953
- Shaull v. AS Beck New York Shoe Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Zachrel v. Universal Oil Products Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
- Way v. Waterloo, Cedar Falls & Northern RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1947
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.