Collins v. Great Northern Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.
Defendant appealed from an order denying.its alternative motion for judgment non obstante or a new trial.
Plaintiff was employed by defendant as a switchman. He was riding in the nighttime a loaded box-car pushed over a “hump” in the well-lighted Cedar Lake Yards and traveling by gravity to a particular track. He was injured by falling from the car. Plaintiff’s version of his experience is substantially this:
Before I got to the top of the “hump” I tightened the brakes and *they took - hold. They squealed or hollered and I released them. From the “hump” there urns a slight decline. As I started…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Patton v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Gulf, Mobile & Northern Railroad v. WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Virginia & S. W. Ry. Co. v. HawkCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1908
- Hurt v. Louisville & N. R. R.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1903
- Nealis v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ballard v. Sacramento Northern Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1932
- Duryea v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
- Carter v. Peoria & Pekin Union Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1936