Legal Opinion
Smith v. Sullivan
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 29, 1990No. Civ. A. No. 89-2386PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER
REVERCOMB, District Judge.
Plaintiff applied for supplemental security income benefits under Title XVI of the Social Security Act on October 8, 1987. The Secretary denied his claim at all administrative levels. This matter is before the Court pursuant to the Plaintiff’s Motion for Reversal or Remand and the Defendant’s Motion for Judgment of Affirmance. 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g), 1383(c)(3).
I. STATUTORY FRAMEWORK
The AU’s May 15, 1989 decision is the final reviewable decision in this case. Plaintiff contends that the decision of the Secretary that Plaintiff is not…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Charles R. GROSS, Appellant, v. Margaret HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
- Samuel A. Ferguson v. Richard S. Schweiker, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Rose E. Brown v. Otis R. Bowen, Secretary, Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
- Lorraine Smith v. Otis R. Bowen, Secretary, Department of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Cunningham v. ColvinDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Brooks v. KijakaziDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024