Legal Opinion

Brooks v. Kijakazi

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided September 10, 2024No. Civil Action No. 2021-1742Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA EBONY B., 1 Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 21-cv-1742-MAU MARTIN O’MALLEY, Commissioner of Social Security, 2 Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Ebony B. (“Plaintiff”) seeks Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) Benefits under the Social Security Act (“the Act”). ECF No. 12–1 at 1. 3 The Social Security Administration (“SSA” or “Commissioner”) entered a final decision denying Plaintiff’s claim on April 26, 2021. Administrative Record (“AR”) at 2–7, 16. On appeal to this Court, Plaintiff seeks reversal or, alternatively, remand for…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Biestek v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  2. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Smith v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  4. Berry v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  5. Butler, Joan S. v. Barnhart, Jo Anne B.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API