Legal Opinion

United States v. Roy F. Munoz

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 22, 1983No. 81-1747PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judge.

Munoz appeals from his conviction for possessing and transporting a golden eagle in violation of 16 U.S.C. § 668(a) (1976). 1 He argues that the evidence should have been suppressed because it was found during a roving vehicle stop that was not supported by a founded suspicion. At issue is whether the practice of stopping all vehicles in National Parks during a roving patrol to check wood permits and ask about park use and game violations is permissible under the Fourth Amendment. We conclude that the stop violated Fourth Amendment rights and reverse.

FACTS

On December…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. United States v. One 1977 Mercedes Benz, 450 SEL, VIN 11603302064538Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  2. Matthew Tarabochia v. Mickey AdkinsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  3. Railway Labor Executives' Ass'n v. BurnleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  4. Commonwealth v. PalmSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. State v. LeggWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2000

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API