Legal Opinion
Commonwealth v. Palm
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided May 20, 1983No. 169PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McEWEN, Judge:
Appellants were charged with a violation of the Pennsylvania Game Law by the unlawful killing of a deer out of season 1 , and convicted as charged before a District Justice. A summary appeal proceeding was taken and after a trial de novo appellants were found guilty. The court entered an order which dismissed the appeal and reimposed the sentence imposed by the District Justice.
Appellants present in their brief the following Statement of Questions:
I. Is probable cause necessary for a Game Commission Officer to stop and seize a vehicle in the course of investigating a suspected…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. Brignoni-PonceSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Commonwealth v. HolcombSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Commonwealth v. WhiteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Commonwealth v. ElliottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Commonwealth v. MarconiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Bradley v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1989
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.