Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Johnson & Higgins Co. v. Safford

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1927No. 20769 and 20770PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.

A determination of the question presented requires a consideration of Sections 644, 644-1, and 644-2, General Code. Briefly stated, these provisions may be summarized as follows:

Under Section 644, no person may be licensed to act as an insurance agent unless a resident of this state. Section 644-1 makes provision that no solicitor’s license shall be issued except to natural persons, resident of the state. Section 644-2 limits the issuance of a foreign broker’s license in this state to a natural person resident of another state to do in .his own state an insurance business on Ohio property.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hanover Fire Insurance v. HardingSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. United States v. JohnstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. La Tourette v. McMasterSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  4. In re Rieger, Kapner & AltmarkDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1907
  5. Roe v. Kansas Ex Rel. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1929

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Independent Insurance v. FabeOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State ex rel. Huntington Insurance Agency, Inc. v. DuryeeOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State ex rel. Huntington Ins. Agency, Inc. v. DuryeeOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Associated Adjusters of Ohio, Inc. v. Ohio Department of InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  5. At & T Global Information Solutions Co. v. Union Tank Car Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1998

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API