Legal Opinion

Preston v. Peck

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 4, 1930PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSanderson, J.

This is an appeal from a decree of the Probate Court allowing an instrument as the will of Nannie E. Wyman. The appellant, who was not named therein, is the only heir at law and next of kin of the person whose name purports to be signed to the document. The sole contest related to the due execution of the instrument, the appellant contending that the signature was a forgery.

After the three subscribing witnesses had testified that they saw the testatrix sign the alleged will, the contestant without objection introduced standards of her signature and exhibited to the court photographs of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dittemore v. DickeyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  2. Union Trust Co. v. MagenisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  3. Demerritt v. RandallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
  4. Coddaire v. SibleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ColemanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  2. King v. GraceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  3. Ott v. Board of Registration in MedicineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  4. Adoption of GeorgiaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  5. Bowles v. ComstockMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API