Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Bowles v. Comstock

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 29, 1934PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.

This is an appeal from the allowance of the substituted third account of Sherman H. Bowles, formerly administrator with the will annexed of Elizabeth Hoar *161Bowles. The appellants are A. Barr Comstock, administrator with the will annexed of the estate not already administered of Elizabeth Hoar Bowles, and Samuel Bowles, life beneficiary of a trust established by a codicil to the will of the testatrix. Sherman H. Bowles and Samuel Bowlesare brothers and sons of the testatrix. Elizabeth Hoar Bowles died January 2, 1924.

On December 10, 1924, Sherman H. Bowles (who will hereinafter be referred to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Moss v. Old Colony Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  2. Lannin v. BuckleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  3. Johnson v. O'LalorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  4. Abeloff v. PeacardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
  5. Brodrick v. O'ConnorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. King v. GraceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  2. Comstock v. BowlesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  3. Thayer Co. v. BinnallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
  4. Bratt v. CoxMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  5. Greene v. Springfield Safe Deposit & Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API