Legal Opinion
Ott v. Board of Registration in Medicine
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided September 11, 1931PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRtjgg, C.J.
The petitioner was duly registered and entitled to practise medicine as a physician in this Commonwealth. Upon due notice and after a hearing his registra*568tian was cancelled by the respondent board for professional misconduct in that he made an agreement to perform an abortion on the person of a named woman. Thereupon this petition was brought. The Massachusetts Medical Society was allowed to intervene without objection. Its attitude is in effect in aid of the petitioner.
This proceeding is wholly statutory. The relevant statutes are three sections of G. L. c. 112. It is provided by § 61 as…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Alford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Swan v. Justices of Superior CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
- Gould's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Commonwealth v. SoarisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- Blankenburg v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- King v. GraceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
- Commonwealth v. SheaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
- Gurry v. Board of Public AccountancyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
- Kravetz v. LipofskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
- Attorney General v. Trustees of Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.