Legal Opinion
Boyd v. Executive Office for United States Attorneys
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 31, 2015No. Civil Action No. 13-1304 (ABJ)PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
AMY BERMAN JACKSON, United States District Judge
Plaintiff Willie E. Boyd brings this pro se action against defendants the Executive Office for United States Attorney (“EOU-SA”) and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco & Firearms (“ATF”) under the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”). All parties have moved for summary judgment. See Defs.’ Renewed Mot. for Summ. J. [Dkt. # 20] (“Defs.’ Mot.”); Mem. in Supp. of Defs.’ Mot. [Dkt. # 20-3] (“Defs.’ Mem.”); PL’s Opp. to Defs.’ Mot. & Cross-Mot. for Summ. J. [Dkt. # 29] (“PL’s Mot.”). For the reasons that follow, the Court will grant…
2Cases cited64 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States Department of Justice v. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the PressSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- National Labor Relations Board v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Safecard Services, Inc. v. Securities and Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Pinson v. United States Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Judicial Watch, Inc. v. United States Department of DefenseDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Borda v. U.S. Dep't of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Boyd v. Executive Office for United States AttorneysDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Judicial Watch, Inc. v. National Archives and Records AdministrationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.