Legal Opinion
Boyd v. Executive Office for United States Attorneys
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 30, 2015No. Civil Action No. 2013-1304PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
AMY BERMAN JACKSON, United States District Judge
Plaintiff Willie E. Boyd brought this pro se action against defendants the Executive Office for United States Attorney (“EOU-SA”) and the Bureau of Acohol, Tobacco & Firearms (“ATF”) under the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”). Compl. [Dkt. # 1]. On March 31, 2015, the Court remanded part of the case so that EOUSA could determine whether four specific documents had been properly withheld. See Boyd v. EOUSA, 87 F.Supp.3d 58, 84-86 (D.D.C.2015). The Court also required EOUSA to file copies of four documents— numbers 1, 3, 6,…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States Department of Justice v. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the PressSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- National Labor Relations Board v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Department of the Air Force v. RoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Sorin v. U.S. Department of JusticeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- Thelen v. United States Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Cullen v. United States Department of Homeland SecurityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2023
- Richard Villar v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2018
- The Intercept Media, Inc. v. National Park ServiceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2024
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.