Henry Dalton & Sons Co. v. City of Oakland
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLorigan, J.
This action is brought by plaintiff as a private corporation and for its own benefit to enjoin the defendant from making certain proposed municipal improvements along its harbor in the bay of San Francisco.
The complaint is in four counts, but a general statement of its allegations will present the grounds upon which plaintiff bases its right to relief.
It is alleged that plaintiff is the owner of a lot of land in the city of Oakland bordering on the line of ordinary high tide in the bay of San Francisco, in which the harbor of Oakland lies, as the line of said ordinary high tide existed in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. Chandler-Dunbar Water Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
- County of Mobile v. KimballSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- People v. California Fish Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
- City of Oakland v. Oakland Water Front Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
- San Francisco Savings Union v. R. G. R. Petroleum & Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1904
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Gray v. Reclamation District No. 1500California Supreme Court · 1917
- Boone v. KingsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Colberg, Inc. v. State of California Ex Rel. Dept. Pub. Wks.California Supreme Court · 1967
- Patton v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Whaler's Village Club v. Califonia Coastal CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.