Legal Opinion

Lake County Bar Ass'n v. Vala

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1998No. 97-2673PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

We accept the findings and conclusions of the board. However, we give more weight than the board did to respondent’s continued disregard of relator’s investigation, a disregard which ill served the profession, this court, and the respondent himself. The requirement to cooperate in disciplinary investigations is rooted in the self-governing nature of the legal profession. As a corollary, each lawyer has a duty to participate in the regulation of the profession, even when he himself is the subject of investigation. Respondent’s failure to cooperate violated that duty and reflects poorly on the…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Dayton Bar Ass'n v. SebreeOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Medina County Bar Ass'n v. MuhlbachOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. RubinoOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Lake Cty. Bar Assn. v. ValaOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. WatsonOhio Supreme Court · 2002

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API