Legal Opinion

Medina County Bar Ass'n v. Muhlbach

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 23, 1998No. 98-721PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

We adopt the findings and conclusions of the board. As a member of the bar, respondent is expected to know the Rules for the Government of the Bar. Gov.Bar R. V(6)(E) provides that within twenty days after the mailing of the notice of a disciplinary complaint, the respondent shall file six copies of his *226or her answer and serve a copy of that answer on counsel of record named in the complaint. Although respondent mailed a “Response to Complaint” to relator on May 12, 1997, that document was not properly filed with the board after the mailing of the notice of the complaint on June 16, 1997.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lake County Bar Ass'n v. ValaOhio Supreme Court · 1998

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Medina Cty Bar Assn. v. MuhlbachOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. MuhlbachOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. MuhlbachOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. WittOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Mahoning County Bar Ass'n v. GuarnieriOhio Supreme Court · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API