Legal Opinion

Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. Rubino

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 2000No. 99-1560PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

We adopt the findings, conclusion, and recommendation of the board. An attorney is required to cooperate with a disciplinary investigation even when the subject of the investigation is himself. Lake Cty. Bar Assn. v. Vala (1998), 82 Ohio St.3d 57, 59, 693 N.E.2d 1083, 1084. Respondent is hereby publicly reprimanded. Costs are taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lake County Bar Ass'n v. ValaOhio Supreme Court · 1998

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. JamesOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Lorain County Bar Ass'n v. PatersonOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. RubinoOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. RubinoOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. RubinoOhio Supreme Court · 2007