Legal Opinion

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Watson

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 26, 2002No. 2002-1137PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} On February 21, 2002, relator, Disciplinary Counsel, charged respondent, Michael Troy Watson of Cleveland, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0029023, in an amended complaint with various violations of the Code of Professional Responsibility and Gov.Bar R. V(4)(G). A panel of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline heard the cause and made the following findings of fact and conclusions of law relative to the misconduct it determined respondent to have committed.

{¶ 2} In 1997, respondent agreed to help a client obtain crime victims’ reparations after the client had allegedly…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lake County Bar Ass'n v. ValaOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. 07/03/2002 Case AnnouncementsOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Lake Cty. Bar Assn. v. ValaOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. WatsonOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Disciplinary Counsel v. WatsonOhio Supreme Court · 2002

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. McCordOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Stark County Bar Ass'n v. WattersonOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Akron Bar Ass'n v. PaulsonOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Columbus Bar Association v. Nyce.Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Disciplinary Counsel v. WatsonOhio Supreme Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API