Legal Opinion

Fernando v. Continental Casualty Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 29, 1926No. 25,389PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.

Action to recover on an accident policy issued to one Boone in which the plaintiff was the beneficiary. The court directed a verdict for the defendant and the plaintiff appeals from the order denying her motion for a new trial.

Boone was killed on September 2, 1924, by a shot from a revolver. The policy upon which it is sought to recover for his death provided:

“This policy does not cover any loss * * * if the injury causing it results from the intentional act of the insured or of any other person.”

The evidence is brief. The only witness to the shooting was a woman with whom Boone had been…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Schumacher v. StreichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Brooks v. Continental Casualty Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1930
  2. Ziolkowski v. Continental Casualty Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1936
  3. Ziolkowski v. Continental Casualty Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1933
  4. Potestio v. Continental Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Southern Surety Co. of N.Y. v. MadisonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API